Dismantling families

Parents struggle for housing security when children get into trouble.

Gloria Franklin, a 20-year resident of public housing, was faced with the possibility of separating her family because of the Chicago Housing Authority’s one-strike policy. Photo by Jason Reblando.

Gloria Franklin never imagined her son’s arrest would put her in danger of losing her home and cost him the right to live under her roof.

But that was the consequence when her 17-year-old son Tyran Pratt was arrested allegedly with $10 worth of marijuana outside Franklin’s home in the Cabrini-Green community.

Following Pratt’s arrest, Franklin received a letter from the Chicago Housing Authority informing her that she was going to be evicted.
 “For what?” Franklin remembers thinking. “I didn’t go to jail. Nothing was in my house.”

But under the CHA’s official occupancy policy, tenants such as Franklin can be evicted from public housing if anyone on their lease is charged with a criminal infraction.

A 20-year resident of public housing, Franklin has lived in a row house on North Cleveland Street for six years—a relic of the Cabrini-Green public housing development that was mostly demolished by 2011.

Franklin’s row house stands out from the rest on her block. Where her front lawn is adorned with flowers and a small garden, the other properties are covered with boards.

Nevertheless, Franklin said it was a good place to raise Pratt, who was in high school when he was arrested in October 2009. She had also been sharing the house on Cleveland with her disabled sister; daughter, 29; and grandson.

Franklin describes Pratt as a good child who tried his best in school. In addition to his regular classes at Roberto Clemente Community Academy, he met with an after-school mentor.

But, like most teenagers, Pratt was susceptible to peer pressure. As she explained, “He had to be with people who lived in his area in order for him to go to school … safely.”

Franklin said that although she knew Pratt smoked marijuana, she never allowed him to smoke around her or anywhere in her house.

“I wasn’t OK with that,” Franklin said, but “when I’m not there, how can I control it?”

On Oct. 3, 2009, Pratt was arrested on the street outside Franklin’s house allegedly with a plastic bag containing one gram—or roughly $10 worth—of marijuana, according to a police report.

Pratt’s arrest came at a high point for marijuana arrests that triggered one-strike cases in the Cabrini development, a Chicago Reporter investigation found. In 2009, 33 people were arrested for marijuana possession, by far the highest of any housing development and more than twice as many than the previous year. Of the 33 arrested, six of them, like Pratt, were 17-year-olds, the single-largest age group of arrestees.

Pratt was booked and released on his own recognizance, according to the police report. Franklin was at work during the incident.
Although Franklin said she was upset with her son, she couldn’t believe what happened next. “The plaintiff … has filed a complaint in this court to have you evicted,” read the letter sent to Franklin on Dec. 10, 2009.

“I’m like, ‘What the heck is this?’” Franklin said.

In subsequent negotiations with the CHA, Franklin said she was told that in order to keep her home, she’d have to take her son off the lease, bar him from the property and accept a yearlong probation.

From December 2009 through July 2010, Franklin consulted with lawyers. “I did not understand how … my son had to be taken off the lease and me put on probation for a year, and there was no case,” Franklin said.

Ultimately, Pratt’s misdemeanor charge was thrown out in court. A Reporter investigation found that more than half of the arrests that triggered one-strike cases were thrown out in criminal court.

Even though Pratt’s case fizzled, the CHA continued Franklin’s case in eviction court. There, a judge ruled that Franklin could keep her home, but she’d have to kick out her son, who was still a minor at the time. She was told to take him off the lease and that he would be permanently barred from any CHA property, even though she didn’t have anywhere for him to stay.

On July 8, 2010, Pratt was permanently barred from the property and removed from the lease.

 Franklin got choked up recalling the moment she told her son. It was one of the most difficult points in her life, she said. “I gave him a hug, shared a few tears, and I just told him, ‘You have to go; I’m sorry,’” Franklin added.

Since Pratt left last summer, Franklin said she hasn’t seen him much. He dropped out of school and has been living on the streets.

Sometimes he’ll call when he’s hungry, and she’ll bring him food. And other times she sees him sleeping in a playground near her house, a sight she describes as “one of the most hurtful things.”

For the most part, Franklin has no idea of her son’s whereabouts.

“He’s everywhere,” she said. “My son is homeless on the street right now.”

She said she feels her son’s absence constantly. “I want my kids to be able to come and visit me,” she said. “That’s all I’m asking.”

Contributing: Angela Caputo

20 comments

Anonymous wrote 1 year 37 weeks ago

Bet they get EBT too

20 years of free housing is enough time for her to have saved up and buy her own house. Take a look at the MLS you can get single family home for less than 10k. If you love your son Get off the taxpayers dime and stand on you own.

Anonymous wrote 1 year 37 weeks ago

Dear racist

The above commenter probably plays too many videogames to every worry about the world around them. Pay them no heed.

Anonymous wrote 1 year 37 weeks ago

Dear Second comment

Race has nothing to do with being given free housing and living off the government for 20 years. She has received thousands in goverment money. And has not seen fit to save even a small amount. Especially when she needed to save her son. As a Father I would move out of public houseing immediatel, if it ment I had to put my minor child out on the street ! Even if it ment I had to live in hotels. This woman (and you) know that by playing the race card they might secure themselves more of the tax payers money and another 20 years of free housing. And as for this story it was posted on the front page of google news and it looks like no one even cares enough to comment. Heed this advice.
True freedom will always be at odds with goverment dependence.

Anonymous wrote 1 year 36 weeks ago

CHA-Evil Empire

Race, is very likely the exact and only reason behind it all. I mean consider the source of the story, their motto is "investigating race and poverty since 1972". This looks like just another of the many race and poverty stories they have uncovered over the years.

Anonymous wrote 1 year 36 weeks ago

You sir or mam are wrong!!

The only thing race has to do with this story is that a magazine that has been "investigating race and poverty since 1972" is that if it were a white family their would likely have been no coverage at all. And to say Race is very likely the "only" reason behind it all. Well that good sir is foolish and irresponsible. statement. This country is full rich and powerful blacks. This citys Mayor is black, and from the Obama admin. are you suggesting that his policys are anti black? Do you realy think that this women's bad choices in life have nothing to do with her being poor and on CHA for 20 years?. I sure hope you see that. And check out that youtube video if you have any questions.

Anonymous wrote 1 year 37 weeks ago

BUT DON'T TAKE MY WORD FOR IT..!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzspsovNvII

Google It's free swipe your ebt

Anonymous wrote 1 year 36 weeks ago

CHA-Evil Empire...still

This is outrageous! What threat is a 17 year old with weed? Not enough to even bother with arresting. The community's and the CHA's reactions to these tenants is unconscionable.

Anonymous wrote 1 year 36 weeks ago

Evil Empire?

If it so evil she should opt out. No one if forcing this family to live in gov housing, As far as The Weed I Have no problem with any one over the age of eighteen having as much weed as they see fit, But we all should have a problem with a minor child having an intoxicating substance of any kind. The reasonable person should understand that If someone if getting an unearned gov benefit that they should not run afoul of the hand that feeds them. So it should stand to reason that the person who gets no gov money should not be forced to pay ttaxes into a fund to house the poor. If the poor can afford marijuana. They the can afford to make a full rent payment . Maybe this teen should have been helping his mother cover bills instead of buying pot. By the way Evil Empire, You should look up what its was realy like during the fall of communisum in the "Evil Empire" I assure you their were much more pressing issues than a punk kid smoking pot on his moms porch, For God sakes kid have a little respect for your mother, she said not to use drugs but your doing it right out front and in the open so the police can see you. If there was any justice in this world this kid would have had a strong father to wring his little neck.

Anonymous wrote 1 year 36 weeks ago

20 Years

20 Years living in Public housing - and I bet she doesn't want to get a full-time job because if she does she will more than likely lose her housing. It's unreal the length of time some people are on the program - You could genuinely house more deserving people - I think HUD should impose a term length on occupancy, because far too many people consider it a right to be in public housing or on section 8, when it is ultimately a privilege. SMH, SMH!

Nene wrote 24 weeks 2 days ago

Nene

I agree keep people on for about ten years then move on to the next applicant. Ten years should be longer enough to get on your feet for the people that can get on their feet. Give others who really need the help a chance. I say the only people who should be able to stay in public housing all they life should be the disabled and or veterans. To everybody get a job or get an education so you can get a job and pay your own way.

Anonymous wrote 1 year 36 weeks ago

In case you were wondering,

In case you were wondering, not all HUD housing is "free" ... many occupants pay a reduced price and/or many of their utilities. I have no idea if this woman does or does not contribute to her rent. But, perhaps, since we don't know her whole story we shouldn't judge her.

Anonymous wrote 1 year 36 weeks ago

CHA housing

I work with many of the CHA residents and housing IS NOT FREE. The rent is reduced but some of these residents pay as much as 700 dollars a month for rent. Rent is based on income and it is a percentage of income. So many residents work and pay for housing the problem is they don't make enough money to afford bigger apartments to house thier families so they have to live where they can afford to live. For the gentlemen who believes housing is free next time check your facts and gain some understanding before you open you mouth about something you know nothing about.

Anonymous wrote 1 year 36 weeks ago

Facts Checked

If you can't afford to house your big family perhaps you should have taken steps to avoid having a big family. But thats not the way of this type of person, They make all the bad choices they want, and expect the tax payer to pick up any slack they have.

Anonymous wrote 1 year 31 weeks ago

CHA AND SECTION 8

CHA AND SECTION 8 HAS SPOILED 2 GENERATIONS OF URBANS. SECTION 8 HAS ALSO RAISED THE RENT LEVELS FOR THE WORKING CLASS. PERHAPS THERE SHOULD BE A 4 OR 5 YEAR LIMIT. IT ALSO TAKES AWAY THE BLACKS MALES UNDERSTANDING OF PROVIDING SHELTER FOR THEIR CHILDREN

Nene wrote 24 weeks 2 days ago

Nene

I agree but it's not just blacks it's all races and class of people.

Anonymous wrote 1 year 27 weeks ago

Typical Irresponsible Parenting

"But when I'm not there how can I control it (his marijuana smoning)?" she asked. Why didn't she lay down some clear expectations for her child and let him know what she expects of him? Even if he doesn't listen, at least the expectation will have been set. He met her other expectation of not doing drugs in the house. Why wouldn't he meet others?

How about this excuse for her son? "He had to be with people who lived in this area in order to go to shcool...safely." Does that mean that if they rob stores, he needs to do that too in order to be one of the boys and avoid being harassed? How about doing something to change the mentality in the area like banding together with other mothers or with members of a church to bring about change? But this is the type of mother that makes excuses for her son without expecting more from him.

She also signed the lease meaning that she was willing to abide buy the laws. Now that she, or her son got busted, she's trying to find a loophole out. Another recipient of the welfare state? You bet. I bet that she'd get all angry and puffed up reading comments like these, provided that she can read.

Anonymous wrote 1 year 24 weeks ago

section 8

just because you have section 8 does not mean your rent is free i pay 420$ a month light 190$ a month in the winter my heat runs as much as 300$ and my bills are always paid on time i am a single parent if it were not for section 8 i would be homeleess i'm caring for a disabled son who is a victim of gun violence before he got shot i worked and paid full rent now i'm changing diapers off my 17 year old and he wasn't a gangbanger nor did he hang on the street corners everyones situation is different just commenting about mine.we have to follow the rules though even though that is a little harsh my heart goes out to the kid they should have a least gave him rehab help him not hurt him.

Anonymous wrote 1 year 24 weeks ago

Responsibility Works Both Ways

This mother chose to follow CHA's rules and could have prepared her son to do the same by sitting down with ALL of her children and explaining that any arrest would lead to a loss of housing. Period. She did not do this and made a tough decision to put her son out of her home and on to the streets. CHA is saying that certain illegal activities will not be allowed by it's residents and they are enforcing these rules. People who sign up for public housing must understand that there are real consequences for lease violations. They must get control over themselves., their children, and their guests.. CHA is making the effort to protect it's "transformation" investment. I am not certain that the residents who are "caught" are actually the victims here.

Nene wrote 24 weeks 2 days ago

Nene

Cha sucks. They only open up their waitlist every 10 years. It takes you 20 years just to get housing move to Minnesota that’s where you will get your help from. They city of Minneapolis is 100 times better than Chicago.

Cha need to open up that waitlist for all housing in 2013. That’s a shame they got people waiting on housing when they got over 30,000 units open for rent. I see they doing an update 3 and 5 years after opening the waitlist for section 8 and public housing. They should have been did this. Cha also got in trouble with Hud too for taking money for empty units that could be housing women with kids or homeless people. Chicago wondering why so many people moving out of the city and state.

Nene wrote 24 weeks 2 days ago

Nene

I know a friend him and his mom haved lived off the taxpayers dime for over 40 years. They have lived in the projects cha housing since the late 60s. Some people just don't want better.

Please register or login to post a comment.

Current Issue

Thousands are being deported without a chance to appear before an immigration judge.